Section 377a

Any male person who, in public or private, commits, or abets the commission of, or procures or attempts to procure the commission by any male person of, any act of gross indecency with another male person, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 2 years.

There is so much talk about this repeal 377a and keep 377a that there are rival websites, each petitioning for their cause.

Why is this being politicised? Is it necessary that it be brought to parliament?

My take? This "to repeal or not to repeal Section 377a" is socially divisive. It is not merely about lifestyle choices. It is not about equal rights.

Public discussions are good. More voices heard would be better. I have this feeling the group supporting the repeal are the minority. Likewise, those who are vehemently against the repeal don't form the majority as well. Most people, I believe, are generally apathetic. But when asked, they will respond.

I would like to think further that half of Singaporeans don't mind having Section 377a repealed. Or don't care. In fact, a sizeable number don't mind homosexuals and gays. They just don't want them at their own home or happening to their own kids.

Anyway, I think Section 377a should be revised, not repealed. If it is to stay, females must be included in the rule, not just males. Why should scissor sisters get all the fun legally while nancy boys have to run from the law.